Close Menu
  • Latest News
    • Market
    • Altcoins
    • Legal and Regulatory
  • Tech
    • Blockchain
    • Security and Privacy
  • Web 3
    • Web3 News
    • NFTs
    • Gaming
  • Learn
    • Education
    • Investments
    • Staking
    • Wallets and Exchanges
  • ICOs
  • Mining
  • Crypto Tools
    • Exchange Tool
  • Shop
What's Hot

Bitdeer Sells All 218 BTC Mined This Week, Returns to Zero Bitcoin Balance

June 20, 2026

South Korea weighs opening crypto transfer licenses to fintech firms

June 20, 2026

CFTC And SEC Seek Input On Derivatives Definitions As Crypto

June 20, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
CryptoPulseDaily.com
  • Latest News
    • Market
    • Altcoins
    • Legal and Regulatory
  • Tech
    • Blockchain
    • Security and Privacy
  • Web 3
    • Web3 News
    • NFTs
    • Gaming
  • Learn
    • Education
    • Investments
    • Staking
    • Wallets and Exchanges
  • ICOs
  • Mining
  • Crypto Tools
    • Exchange Tool
  • Shop
CryptoPulseDaily.com
Home»Altcoins»A tiny validation flaw, a $2.19M drain – What went wrong at Aztec Network?
Altcoins

A tiny validation flaw, a $2.19M drain – What went wrong at Aztec Network?

June 16, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Router contract of Aztec Network is in the news after being the subject of a suspicious transaction that was discovered on the Ethereum [ETH] blockchain. This led to the loss of assets valued at about $2.19 million.

In fact, the wallet address “0x0f18….edd17” used money from the protocol’s Router contract to carry out the transaction.

The attack was suspiciousThe attack was suspicious
The attack was suspicious

According to CertiK, the attack was “suspicious” because the attacker might have taken advantage of a weakness in the smart contract, obtained unauthorized access to protocol funds, or altered the logic of the contract to siphon off assets.

A possible smart contract validation flaw

However, some cues did suggest that the protocol’s handling of proof data was flawed in the smart contract validation process. The problem specifically seemed to be with the function computeRootHashes(), which oversaw confirming the legitimacy of the supplied _proofData but only examined the first part of it.

Nevertheless, the middle portion of the same _proofData payload contained the data that processDepositsAndWithdrawals() subsequently used to carry out token transfers.

Therefore, an attacker might have created a malicious proof in which the unverified middle section contained manipulated deposit or withdrawal instructions, while the verified portion remained valid and passed the protocol’s security checks.

For its part, the contract ended up carrying out unauthorized token transfers as a result of those instructions not being properly authenticated before processing. Simply put, there appeared to be a discrepancy between what was verified and what was actually executed. 

More such incidents

The timing here is interesting because Raydium also found a coding error in its old AMM V3 program that caused $1.34 million worth of cryptocurrencies to be stolen from five pools.

See also  Cardano prices surge by 9% - Are 2024 ADA predictions coming true

Meanwhile, another governance takeover attack saw an exploiter steal about $1.5 million in Ethereum from a Balancer liquidity pool. 

A new exploit that targeted Ethereum’s Alephium TokenBridge was also found recently. In this exploit, $815,000 was drained in seven minutes using three of the four compromised guardian keys that signed forged VAAs (Verified Action Approvals).

Similarly, according to an independent Quantstamp investigation, Humanity Protocol linked a targeted phishing attack against one of its directors to the attacker’s acquisition of administrative credentials, upgrades to contracts, transfers of Ethereum tokens, and creation of new H tokens on the BNB Chain.

Overall, the Total Value Hacked (USD) has now reached $81.73 million in 30 days, according to DeFiLlama data. With $634.85 million lost in 2026 alone, April has seen the highest value drained so far.

2026 value drained2026 value drained
Source: DeFiLlama

Final Summary

  • The flaw seems to have been caused by _proofData’s incomplete verification.
  • The episode is the most recent in a string of DeFi security lapses.

Source link

2.19M Aztec Drain Flaw Network Tiny Validation Wrong
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

CFTC And SEC Seek Input On Derivatives Definitions As Crypto

June 20, 2026

Axie Infinity jumps 23% as volume explodes 630% – Can bulls push AXS toward $1.58?

June 20, 2026

Aerodrome Finance surges 14% – AERO eyes THESE key levels next

June 20, 2026

Kalshi IPO Talk Shows Prediction Markets Moving Mainstream

June 20, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

US Congressman’s Warning On Global Elite Control

September 23, 2023

How Incubators and Accelerators Can Help Web3 Startups Succeed

April 13, 2024

5 Biggest Underperforming Cryptos of the Week

May 26, 2023

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news From Crypto Daily Pulse directly in your Inbox!

Our mission is to develop a community of people who try to make financially sound decisions. The website strives to educate individuals in making wise choices about Crypto, ICOs, Web3, Blockchain and more.

We're social. Connect with us:

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
Top Insights

Bitdeer Sells All 218 BTC Mined This Week, Returns to Zero Bitcoin Balance

June 20, 2026

South Korea weighs opening crypto transfer licenses to fintech firms

June 20, 2026

CFTC And SEC Seek Input On Derivatives Definitions As Crypto

June 20, 2026
Get Informed

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news From Crypto Daily Pulse directly in your Inbox!

  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2026 Crypto Pulse Daily - All rights reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Cleantalk Pixel
  • bitcoinBitcoin(BTC)$63,949.001.45%
  • ethereumEthereum(ETH)$1,731.931.94%
  • tetherTether(USDT)$1.00-0.01%
  • binancecoinBNB(BNB)$586.391.33%
  • usd-coinUSDC(USDC)$1.00-0.01%
  • rippleXRP(XRP)$1.151.22%
  • solanaSolana(SOL)$71.503.60%
  • tronTRON(TRX)$0.3246980.85%
  • Figure HelocFigure Heloc(FIGR_HELOC)$1.032.20%
  • HyperliquidHyperliquid(HYPE)$69.920.23%