His organization started work several weeks ago as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act has been heading toward the intense endgame of its U.S. Senate negotiations, in which many Democrats and some Republicans have wavered or stridently withheld their support as some of the bill’s most contentious points are debated.
“As the public dialogue and debate is going on about the Clarity Act and other regulatory schemes, we want the decision makers and the American public to have all the information that they possibly can and understand the risks in each different category,” Fay said.
A June survey it commissioned of 1,000 voters suggested that 65% of them viewed crypto with a “high level of distrust,” the group reported — similar to findings in a CoinDesk survey earlier in the year in which 60% of respondents saw crypto as a mostly negative force in the economy.
Crypto Watchdog’s push for transparency doesn’t extend to its own backers. Similar to certain dark-money efforts on the other side of the crypto ledger, such as the multi-million-dollar, pro-crypto Cedar Innovation Foundation that’s pitted itself against Democratic officials, it’s not revealing the sources of its funding.
When Fay was asked who was paying for the organization’s activity, he said, “I’m not going to speak for our funders.” And when asked whether transparency should go both ways, he argued that crypto transparency and information about Crypto Watchdog’s supporters are “apples and oranges.”
