Coinbase has filed a legal objection to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) latest attempt to delay the release of key documents related to the alleged debanking of crypto firms.
On April 10, the exchange opposed the FDIC’s request for a 16-day extension in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit.
Paul Grewal, the company’s Chief Legal Officer, called the request “absurd” while emphasizing that the FDIC submitted 13 pages to ask for more time to decide whether it needs even further delays.
He wrote:
“FDIC just filed 13 pages in our FOIA suit asking the Court for another 16 days to decide whether to ask us for … even more delay. As laid out in our response, this is absurd.”
In its court filing, Coinbase accused the FDIC of stalling and failing to meet its obligations under FOIA. The exchange argued that the agency’s redacted documents were so heavily censored that they offered no meaningful insight.
It also challenged the FDIC’s claim that the new response deadline is May 2, stating that the actual due date should be April 16. According to Coinbase, the FDIC has had ample time to respond and is now attempting to sidestep its legal responsibilities by misinterpreting FOIA deadlines.
This legal battle is part of Coinbase’s broader efforts to expose the government’s role in crypto debanking.
Earlier this year, court-ordered disclosures revealed hundreds of pages of internal FDIC documents showing that the agency had pressured US banks to cut ties with digital asset firms.
Some banks were told to halt services to crypto businesses until they received regulatory clearance, while others were warned about reputational risks associated with engaging with the sector.
However, Coinbase believes these disclosures only scratch the surface and the company is extensively pushing for more transparency to understand the full extent of the FDIC’s role in crypto debanking.
Meanwhile, the FDIC has recently taken steps to align more closely with the crypto industry, revoking several anti-crypto regulations and working toward a more transparent framework for US banks engaging with digital assets
5 Comments
Is CARBOFIRE a scam, or is it a legitimate product?: carbofire scam
Is NeuroPrime a Scam or Legit?: NeuroPrime scam
Whats up! I simply want to give a huge thumbs up for the nice data you have right here on this post. I shall be coming again to your weblog for extra soon.
I always was concerned in this topic and still am, thanks for posting.
I do enjoy the manner in which you have presented this specific challenge and it does indeed give me personally some fodder for thought. Nevertheless, because of everything that I have seen, I only hope when the responses pack on that people today stay on point and not get started upon a tirade involving some other news of the day. Yet, thank you for this fantastic piece and though I do not necessarily agree with the idea in totality, I regard the point of view.